首页 > 学习园地 > 英语学习

The over-zealous PR person

雕龙文库

【简介】感谢网友“雕龙文库”参与投稿,这里小编给大家分享一些,方便大家学习。

By Raymond Zhou

My friend Zeng Jian recently posted an article railing against one component of the celebrity entourage, i.e. the publicity person and his or her fastidiousness with which reporters' questions are vetted.

Zeng is a veteran reporter that covers China's showbiz and he works for one of the biggest portal sites. That is to say, he probably gets more respect than the average workman on the beat. As he complained, reporters were rarely asked to submit a question list when he first started out in the business. Of course, a diligent person would prepare at least a page of questions in advance just for himself or herself. It could be scribbling only the writer could recognize.

However, a new practice has come into being: Reporters have to file the questions to the P.R. firm, who would forward it to the assistant to the star. And they would ask you to revise the questions, add something here or delete something there. Mostly deletions, though.

Zeng's griping got a lot of responses from his WeChat circle of friends. I chuckled, but did not add to the spool of incriminating tales.

The most famous story in recent memory of publicity screening that hurt more than helped its client is the one involving movie star Tang Wei. She divulged in an early interview that her favorite dish is pork braised in brown sauce. Her PR team deemed this innocuous detail unfit for her public image and forced the reporter to change it to mushroom and vegetables. The reporter spilled the beans and Tang was viewed as hypocritical. In later interviews, reporters were strictly forbidden from touching upon this topic. In the end, Tang came out to clarify that she indeed likes the pork dish.

Zeng said it was the P.R. guard who deprived Tang from a timely clarification on the issue.

In my experience, the celebrity client rarely reads the questions. It is the assistant or publicist who performs the mental acrobatic routine of shielding flying daggers. So they would prefer softball questions or questions couched in the idolizing language of fandom.

Most movie stars I've interviewed are very intelligent. Depending on their scheduling, which could be hectic on a campaign, they can be quick-witted and willing to communicate. It is the routine questions that would bore them (though they're good at not showing it). If you come up with unusual but relevant questions, they would light up. But those are often the questions that get nipped in the bud by the PR machine.

I don't have a problem with vetting, but it would be hard for me to stick to a script. If it's a natural dialogue, it would create its own flow and question ten may jump to question two as it happened with my conversation with British actor Colin Firth. Korean stars would not allow this, says Zeng, because the translator would not budge if you deviate from the prepared list.

Sure, reporters ask stupid questions, too. It is the job of their editors and readers to weed them out.

If you treat celebrity interviewees as fragile porcelain, they will lose their tenacity as normal human beings and become brittle.

Broadcaster

Raymond Zhou is a columnist for China Daily. A bilingual writer specializing in movies, theater and other cultural or social topics, he has published 20 Chinese and English books in addition to numerous articles. Other than critical and journalistic writing, he writes and directs stage plays and films. He has an MBA from the University of California at Berkeley and two other degrees from China.

By Raymond Zhou

My friend Zeng Jian recently posted an article railing against one component of the celebrity entourage, i.e. the publicity person and his or her fastidiousness with which reporters' questions are vetted.

Zeng is a veteran reporter that covers China's showbiz and he works for one of the biggest portal sites. That is to say, he probably gets more respect than the average workman on the beat. As he complained, reporters were rarely asked to submit a question list when he first started out in the business. Of course, a diligent person would prepare at least a page of questions in advance just for himself or herself. It could be scribbling only the writer could recognize.

However, a new practice has come into being: Reporters have to file the questions to the P.R. firm, who would forward it to the assistant to the star. And they would ask you to revise the questions, add something here or delete something there. Mostly deletions, though.

Zeng's griping got a lot of responses from his WeChat circle of friends. I chuckled, but did not add to the spool of incriminating tales.

The most famous story in recent memory of publicity screening that hurt more than helped its client is the one involving movie star Tang Wei. She divulged in an early interview that her favorite dish is pork braised in brown sauce. Her PR team deemed this innocuous detail unfit for her public image and forced the reporter to change it to mushroom and vegetables. The reporter spilled the beans and Tang was viewed as hypocritical. In later interviews, reporters were strictly forbidden from touching upon this topic. In the end, Tang came out to clarify that she indeed likes the pork dish.

Zeng said it was the P.R. guard who deprived Tang from a timely clarification on the issue.

In my experience, the celebrity client rarely reads the questions. It is the assistant or publicist who performs the mental acrobatic routine of shielding flying daggers. So they would prefer softball questions or questions couched in the idolizing language of fandom.

Most movie stars I've interviewed are very intelligent. Depending on their scheduling, which could be hectic on a campaign, they can be quick-witted and willing to communicate. It is the routine questions that would bore them (though they're good at not showing it). If you come up with unusual but relevant questions, they would light up. But those are often the questions that get nipped in the bud by the PR machine.

I don't have a problem with vetting, but it would be hard for me to stick to a script. If it's a natural dialogue, it would create its own flow and question ten may jump to question two as it happened with my conversation with British actor Colin Firth. Korean stars would not allow this, says Zeng, because the translator would not budge if you deviate from the prepared list.

Sure, reporters ask stupid questions, too. It is the job of their editors and readers to weed them out.

If you treat celebrity interviewees as fragile porcelain, they will lose their tenacity as normal human beings and become brittle.

Broadcaster

Raymond Zhou is a columnist for China Daily. A bilingual writer specializing in movies, theater and other cultural or social topics, he has published 20 Chinese and English books in addition to numerous articles. Other than critical and journalistic writing, he writes and directs stage plays and films. He has an MBA from the University of California at Berkeley and two other degrees from China.

相关图文

推荐文章

网站地图:栏目 TAGS 范文 作文 文案 学科 百科

信息流广告 周易 易经 代理招生 二手车 网络营销 旅游攻略 非物质文化遗产 查字典 社区团购 精雕图 戏曲下载 抖音代运营 易学网 互联网资讯 成语 成语故事 诗词 工商注册 注册公司 抖音带货 云南旅游网 网络游戏 代理记账 短视频运营 在线题库 国学网 知识产权 抖音运营 雕龙客 雕塑 奇石 散文 自学教程 常用文书 河北生活网 好书推荐 游戏攻略 心理测试 石家庄人才网 考研真题 汉语知识 心理咨询 手游安卓版下载 兴趣爱好 网络知识 十大品牌排行榜 商标交易 单机游戏下载 短视频代运营 宝宝起名 范文网 电商设计 免费发布信息 服装服饰 律师咨询 搜救犬 Chat GPT中文版 经典范文 优质范文 工作总结 二手车估价 实用范文 古诗词 衡水人才网 石家庄点痣 养花 名酒回收 石家庄代理记账 女士发型 搜搜作文 石家庄人才网 钢琴入门指法教程 词典 围棋 chatGPT 读后感 玄机派 企业服务 法律咨询 chatGPT国内版 chatGPT官网 励志名言 河北代理记账公司 文玩 语料库 游戏推荐 男士发型 高考作文 PS修图 儿童文学 买车咨询 工作计划 礼品厂 舟舟培训 IT教程 手机游戏推荐排行榜 暖通,电地暖, 女性健康 苗木供应 ps素材库 短视频培训 优秀个人博客 包装网 创业赚钱 养生 民间借贷律师 绿色软件 安卓手机游戏 手机软件下载 手机游戏下载 单机游戏大全 免费软件下载 石家庄论坛 网赚 手游下载 游戏盒子 职业培训 资格考试 成语大全 英语培训 艺术培训 少儿培训 苗木网 雕塑网 好玩的手机游戏推荐 汉语词典 中国机械网 美文欣赏 红楼梦 道德经 标准件 电地暖 网站转让 鲜花 书包网 英语培训机构 电商运营