【简介】感谢网友“雕龙文库”参与投稿，这里小编给大家分享一些，方便大家学习。
Using modern technology to work at home benefits workers only, but not employers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
这道题目实际上是一道骨灰级的考题的语义扩大，以前见过的是否同意在家办公或者在家办公的利弊就是这道考题的原型，只是这道题目加上了高科技手段这样一些限定字眼，其实完全可以具体化到computers, the Internet, telecommunicating等常见的科技类型。
这篇文章如果按照中庸的方式去写，会比较容易构思一些，也就是主体加让步的方式。下面提供一些思路，供大家参考。
1.在家工作的员工的生活方式首先将会改变。可以灵活支配自己的时间flexible time allocation，不再需要朝九晚五的生活nine-to-five routine，能腾出时间照顾老人陪伴小孩。
2.在家工作改善了生活质量，创造了更多的生产力productivity，空闲的时间，提供了更多的教育和更少的污染。
3.管理者可以看到好处：病假sick leave的减少，年假annual leave的减少，工人补偿减低以及办公成本的节省
4.远程办公的灵活性是未来的趋势
1.在家办公的人面临着被社交圈抛弃的危险：may face the risk that they will be left out of the communication loop.
2.在家办公可能不会受到来自同事的干扰，但是却要面临电视、家务和家庭成员的干扰。
3.在家办公意味着没有支援，也不能在紧要关头得到指导了和帮助。
4.雇主需要担心职员是否足够自律。
阅读
There are few more sobering online activities than entering data into college-tuition calculators and gasping as the Web spits back a six-figure sum. But economists say families about to go into debt to fund four years of partying, as well as studying, can console themselves with the knowledge that college is an investment that, unlike many bank stocks, should yield huge dividends。
A 2008 study by two Harvard economists notes that the labor-market premium to skillor the amount college graduates earned thats greater than what high-school graduate earneddecreased for much of the 20th century, but has come back with a vengeance since the 1980s. In 2005, The typical full-time year-round U.S. worker with a four-year college degree earned $50,900, 62% more than the $31,500 earned by a worker with only a high-school diploma。
Theres no question that going to college is a smart economic choice. But a look at the strange variations in tuition reveals that the choice about which college to attend doesnt come down merely to dollars and cents. Does going to Columbia University yield a 40% greater return than attending the University of Colorado at Boulder as an out-of-state student ? Probably not. Does being an out-of-state student at the University of Colorado at Boulder yield twice the amount of income as being an in-state student there? Not likely。
No, in this consumerist age, most buyers arent evaluating college as an investment, but rather as a consumer productlike a car or clothes or a house. And with such purchases, price is only one of many crucial factors to consider。
As with automobiles, consumers in todays college marketplace have vast choices, and people search for the one that gives them the most comfort and satisfaction in line with their budgets. This accounts for the willingness of people to pay more for different types of experiences . And just as two auto purchasers might spend an equal amount of money on very different cars, college students often show a willingness to pay essentially the same price for vastly different products. So which is it? Is college an investment product like a stock or a consumer product like a car? In keeping with the automotive worlds hottest consumer trend, maybe its best to characterize it as a hybrid ; an expensive consumer product that, over time, will pay rich dividends。
Using modern technology to work at home benefits workers only, but not employers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
这道题目实际上是一道骨灰级的考题的语义扩大，以前见过的是否同意在家办公或者在家办公的利弊就是这道考题的原型，只是这道题目加上了高科技手段这样一些限定字眼，其实完全可以具体化到computers, the Internet, telecommunicating等常见的科技类型。
这篇文章如果按照中庸的方式去写，会比较容易构思一些，也就是主体加让步的方式。下面提供一些思路，供大家参考。
1.在家工作的员工的生活方式首先将会改变。可以灵活支配自己的时间flexible time allocation，不再需要朝九晚五的生活nine-to-five routine，能腾出时间照顾老人陪伴小孩。
2.在家工作改善了生活质量，创造了更多的生产力productivity，空闲的时间，提供了更多的教育和更少的污染。
3.管理者可以看到好处：病假sick leave的减少，年假annual leave的减少，工人补偿减低以及办公成本的节省
4.远程办公的灵活性是未来的趋势
1.在家办公的人面临着被社交圈抛弃的危险：may face the risk that they will be left out of the communication loop.
2.在家办公可能不会受到来自同事的干扰，但是却要面临电视、家务和家庭成员的干扰。
3.在家办公意味着没有支援，也不能在紧要关头得到指导了和帮助。
4.雇主需要担心职员是否足够自律。
阅读
There are few more sobering online activities than entering data into college-tuition calculators and gasping as the Web spits back a six-figure sum. But economists say families about to go into debt to fund four years of partying, as well as studying, can console themselves with the knowledge that college is an investment that, unlike many bank stocks, should yield huge dividends。
A 2008 study by two Harvard economists notes that the labor-market premium to skillor the amount college graduates earned thats greater than what high-school graduate earneddecreased for much of the 20th century, but has come back with a vengeance since the 1980s. In 2005, The typical full-time year-round U.S. worker with a four-year college degree earned $50,900, 62% more than the $31,500 earned by a worker with only a high-school diploma。
Theres no question that going to college is a smart economic choice. But a look at the strange variations in tuition reveals that the choice about which college to attend doesnt come down merely to dollars and cents. Does going to Columbia University yield a 40% greater return than attending the University of Colorado at Boulder as an out-of-state student ? Probably not. Does being an out-of-state student at the University of Colorado at Boulder yield twice the amount of income as being an in-state student there? Not likely。
No, in this consumerist age, most buyers arent evaluating college as an investment, but rather as a consumer productlike a car or clothes or a house. And with such purchases, price is only one of many crucial factors to consider。
As with automobiles, consumers in todays college marketplace have vast choices, and people search for the one that gives them the most comfort and satisfaction in line with their budgets. This accounts for the willingness of people to pay more for different types of experiences . And just as two auto purchasers might spend an equal amount of money on very different cars, college students often show a willingness to pay essentially the same price for vastly different products. So which is it? Is college an investment product like a stock or a consumer product like a car? In keeping with the automotive worlds hottest consumer trend, maybe its best to characterize it as a hybrid ; an expensive consumer product that, over time, will pay rich dividends。
